Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Last post


Well I've been reading all of these bittersweet remarks about graduation and moving on to "real" life in these last blogs, and I have to say, while I understand what you're going through, I'm haven't hit the bittersweetness quite yet. Yep, I still have one semester to complete (and yes, I cheated my way into the class . . . but as Taylor reminded me tonight, one simply cannot pass up any class taught by Dr. Sexson.) By the way, I had the privilege of viewing Abby's class's Lysistrata performance tonight! It was hilarious, and they succeeded in packing the "theatre." I couldn't stop laughing and I was SO impressed with their rendition of the play (not to mention, some of the guys really came out of their shells!) oops (ha), I mean of course that they were much less shy than I have known them to be in other classes. But also, some of them did have some difficulties concealing their "swords" beneath their togas.

Though my death as an English major does not loom in the immediate future (but is forthcoming,) my death in this class takes place all too soon. I feel blessed to have been a part of the class, and I am so grateful to all of my peers for all of their wonderful insights and intellects. One of my favorite parts of every semester is peering back over the books we have read, the pieces we have written, and admiring our work. I know it sounds egotistical, but you have to admit, it's fulfilling to see the road we've taken. Even if we haven't quite reached Rome, we're still forging ahead (if that's where we're headed anyhow.)
But like Kari mentioned in her last blog, it's not about the praise or pride that we may receive or experience when musing over our work, it's just about the work, the actions we made. I must remind myself to be satisfied in the moment of the work rather than feel the need to retrace my steps. Well, as Sam might say, I suppose "I am not worthy."
Regarding today's presentations, I loved Little Gidding's funeral, how they immortalized each and every one of us on a tombstone. I thought it was interesting that our group (Dry Salvages) also immortalized each member of the class. We immortalized our peers in the leaves of the Yew tree. I hope you all enjoyed the story we read to you that was comprised solely of your blogs. We drew everyone's story into one and created a collective "I" as if the class shared a singular consciousness. In the process of pulling the story together, I was blown away at the "chances" of how each piece of the puzzle fit together effortlessly. Our stories naturally flowed into one. So, as you know, that's because all of our stories are made up.
You know, I don't mean to offend anyone in the class, but I have to say that each person in our class is sort of weird in their own special way. I mean this in every way to be a compliment, because I appreciate all of the quirks, all of the unique, individuals. In fact I'm not usually a fan of people who aren't weird, simply for the fact that no one is actually "normal"; therefore, if they appear normal on the exterior, they're scared to face themselves.
Also, as I'm the only one who's "not an adult in the class", I believe it is my sacred duty to remind you all of Taylor's insight that "we need to look for the mythological, the epiphanies, the children we buried in the earth on our quest for adulthood and knowledge. We need to hear the child’s call, remember how to enter the garden and to see ourselves and know ourselves for the first time." In my opinion, this is the best advice in moving forward with life. Regardless of what obstacles may arise, if we can remember to look within for the essences of ourselves that were once pure as children, we will be able to return to those essences, enabling us to perform right action.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Presentation Remarks

Taylor: beautiful. Listening to Taylor read her paper, I remembered her way with language that most people would kill for. She writes explicitly, but also with fluidity and tone.
Using her diary was the perfect humorous addition to her paper, and it also lent credulity to everything she said.

Sam: smart. Sam states the connections she has drawn between these many books, both in and outside of class, in such a warm and inviting way. I love listening to her read her words; her voice is so pure and melodious, and from it flow all of these insightful ruminations. This is what our experience has been about over the course of our undergraduate years: learning to draw parallels, make connections, and most importantly, learning to think.

Tai: knock your socks off hilarious. and also smart. Tai took the topic of death and moulded it into a piece that we could all laugh at, but also relate to. Also his slip up (that everyone seems to make) in telling the Rabbi that he was in it for the money is priceless.

Paper

I'm not ordinarily one to turn things in late, but this became an exception for better or worse, considering it should have been done at 9am this morning.

Here it is: my final work. I don't think I have ever before spent longer on a single piece of schoolwork. I am not sure it is any better for the time.
To be honest, I was actually sort of proud of it this morning at 8am. Then, after listening to Taylor's beautiful words that just flow right out of heaven or something, I am not so proud of it. It is stilted and rigid in comparison.
Regardless, I hope you enjoy it for what it is.

Dancing at the Still Point: A Practical Guide to Nourishing the Soil

We are born into this world, part of the spinning molting collection of material. We wriggle our ways in just as the leaves of trees squeeze through the waves of the air to finally touch down on solid ground. I happened along quite early on the morning of February 25th, 1987. Plenty of other babies that day, I'm sure, but I was me. And little did I know that I was something no one else could know. I looked around the room with eyes that were too big for my head. Everything swam fuzzily before me; how strange to see things around me, a haze of stuff; how strange to be in this body, to be someone. Surely at that point I had no idea what “me” was or who “me” was for that matter, but this was the project at hand. On that day, February 25th, I embarked on a journey to fulfill the meaning of me. By entering into the world, I signed a contract stating that I would endeavor to fulfill my dharma thereby allowing my individual dance to emerge.
Within each individual lies a strand of being that constitutes its unique “what-ness” or “who-ness,” which Hopkins calls inscape. Often this strand, though it directs our every movement, is elusive to track down and come to know. It does seem that to know oneself should prove easy; however, it takes great skill and patience to learn to listen to our inner strand of self, and often, it cannot be accomplished in a single lifetime. In order to really be ourselves, we must learn to still our souls, minds, and selves in order to know that intrinsic silent core of our self, the still point.
Before finding the still point, we must first know it and understand it. In Burnt Norton, the moment in the rose garden that is timeless and placeless embodies the nature of the still point. “I can only say, there we have been: but I cannot say where. / And I cannot say, how long, for that is to place it in time” (Eliot BN 68-9). This moment of stillness lives outside of time, seems to hang upon the air, breathless, like the moment when Rat and Mole experience the sunrise in the moment when “there was utter silence in the bird-haunted branches,” which gives us pause (Grahame 124). But such moments as these are the very instances in which we can know ourselves most clearly, experience a lifetime of clarity in a momentless moment. And it is at this “still point of the turning world. Neither flesh nor fleshless;” that the ultimate clarity is brought to light. For here, “Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance is” (Eliot BN 62-3). Our dance epitomizes our dharma, our sacred duty in this lifetime that is only realized in mental stillness. Once we learn to find both the still point in time and our own stillness within that point, then and only then can we contribute our piece of the pie, make our waves in the sea, and “nourish . . . the life of significant soil” (Eliot DS 131-3). In order to contribute, to dance our individual dance, we must first know the still point.
Every soul that enters this world, every organism that lives, has an axis that juts through its core providing meaning and a sense of purpose. Just as the earth rotates on an axis, so do we, as souls, have centers, points of reference from which we operate. Gerard Manley Hopkins explains, “I look through my eye and the window and the air; the eye is my eye and of me and me, the windowpane is my windowpane but not of me nor me. A self then will consist of a centre and a surrounding area or circumference, of a point of reference and a belonging field” (Hopkins 243). We can envision the earth’s vast circumference spinning, grounded by its axis. From this center, the body of the earth or “belonging field” of the earth, made up of rivers, mountains, hills, and cities, dances round, encircling the silent core. In the same manner does every individual operate from his or her still center. Our arms function like the earth’s rivers, flowing out, doing work. But whether they be rivers or arms, they originate from a center, requisite for movement but remaining quiet and still while the movement abounds around. When the axis of a being is located and accessed, that being has arrived at its most perfect state.
The dancing ballerina, for example, when dancing always remains perfectly balanced, her center motionless as her body courses through the room. In the same manner does the dandelion's seed, when traveling, move on the wings of the wind. It twirls and falls, twists and sways, fulfilling its purpose while the axis remains at the center of all movement, still amidst the dance and play of the twirling body.
In youth, our axes or senses of purpose in life are most clear; unfortunately at this stage in life, we are not conscious of this. When Santiago, in The Alchemist, meets Melchizedek, the King of Salem, Coelho writes, “The boy didn’t know what a person’s ‘Personal Legend’ was.” The King of Salem explains to Santiago, “It’s what you have always wanted to accomplish. Everyone, when they are young, knows what their Personal Legend is. At that point in their lives, everything is clear and possible. They are not afraid to dream, and to yearn for everything . . . But, as time passes, a mysterious force begins to convince them that it will be impossible for them to realize their Personal Legend” (22). Children have a clarity that adults lose over time; as we age, we develop a stronger knowledge of repercussion (and possibly a bit of cynicism as well), which stunts our decisions and prevents us from dreaming possibilities. Instead of imagining, “What if I tried to fly and flew!” we think, “What if I tried to fly and fell.” Suddenly our sense of purpose turns to mush and becomes the very thing we will never attempt for fear of failing. Of course, paradoxically, the moment we realize the desire to know our purpose in life is exactly the moment when we lose the capacity to trust in that purpose.
Arjuna, like most adults, cannot trust in his purpose and therefore questions his actions out on the battlefield. So many paths arise in and on the way to adulthood that it becomes difficult to distinguish one from the next. We end up standing in the middle of our own battlefield in life, over-thinking our options or simply failing to consider them at all. In The Bhagavad-Gita, according to Sanjaya, Arjuna suddenly hits a brick wall while on the battlefield and says to Krishna, “I do not want to kill them / even if I am killed, Krishna . . . Honor forbids us to kill / our cousins, Dritarashtra’s sons; / how can we know happiness / if we kill our own kinsmen?” (Stoler Miller 1.35, 37). Realizing that he has a choice in the matter, Arjuna finds fear in the potential repercussions of his decisions and becomes stuck in inaction. Sanjaya narrates, “Arjuna slumped into the chariot / and laid down his bow and arrows, / his mind tormented by grief” (Stoler Miller 1.47). Too overwhelmed by conflicting ideals and values, Arjuna gives up.
The noise and hubbub of every day life, social expectations, rules, and even opinions can behave like white noise that is no longer relaxing but distracting. Amidst all the rules and regulations that others set up around us, it can be extraordinarily difficult to stay on track with our own purpose, especially in the event that our purpose directly opposes the social norm. As in the case of Arjuna, (though Krishna will explain otherwise), his sacred duty at first glance seems to act in complete opposition to filial piety. He cannot bear to ignore the tradition laid down by his ancestors, and yet he cannot bear to surrender in battle. He is torn between two waves of the sea. When we arrive at such a barrier in life, we must back up and start from square one because we cannot make decisions confidently without knowing our values and ourselves.
Let us embark on the project of stilling our souls, minds, and selves in order to know the still point in ourselves from which we can dance our own unique dance. The first step involves realizing that one is, in fact, entirely unique from any other being. At this stage in the game it is not important that we understand the composition of our uniqueness; rather, we must simply recognize that “consciousness and feeling of myself, that taste of myself, of I and me above and in all things . . . incommunicable by any means to another man (as when I was a child I used to ask myself: What must it be to be someone else?). Nothing else in nature comes near this unspeakable stress of pitch, distinctiveness, and selving, this selfbeing of my own” (Hopkins 234). Upon recognizing this “me”-ness within ourselves the fact that nothing else in the world can replace our individuality, we allow ourselves to begin to notice all of the nuances of our identities. As we begin to see this self emerge brighter and clearer, we inevitably acquire a pride in our own nature.
Sometime in primary school, likely around the age of five, I undertook my first step in realizing that I was me, a unique being. I realized (or more aptly, unjustifiably proclaimed) my uniqueness. I cannot exactly recall when or how many times this occurred, but I remember contemplating the nature of my own thoughts. "How strange that I am me. How wonderful that I can see the world in my way, through my eyes; I am five, and I can climb the tree house and look down on all the little three-year-olds that aren’t allowed. Humph." I also remember firmly deciding that my color world was surely far different from everyone else's. The only reason I called blue the same as everyone else was because that was the word assigned to that color at school; regardless, I was convinced that when I looked at blue on the page, it was surely a very different color in my eyes. Once I had sufficiently proclaimed my uniqueness, then and only then, could I even begin to consider the next step.
The second step requires relinquishing desires, distractions, and ego; it is kenosis, the emptying out of your conscious will. T.S. Eliot explains the concept of patiently letting go in order that we might move into a mode of stillness as opposed to one of rash decision-making. He writes:
I said to my soul, be still, and wait without hope
For hope would be hope for the wrong thing; wait without love
For love would be love of the wrong thing; there is yet faith
But the faith and the love and the hope are all in the waiting.
Wait without thought, for you are not ready for thought:
So the darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing. (EC 123-8)
Often we assume we know what’s good for ourselves. Eliot reminds us to take a step back and release our preconceived notions, the ideals that we impress upon our lives. It is fruitless to act until we know what we’re acting for or towards; in other words it is fruitless to attempt to push forward in our own lives until we know ourselves well enough to know what it is we’re looking for.
When I arrived at my first day of college, I cried a goodbye to my mom then made every effort to jump on the ride. I felt that I was living the dream. I was in New York at a great school. But to be entirely honest with myself, I quickly became the sad epitome of a poor, small-town Montana girl flailing to fit in with these worldly, upper class New Yorkers. My peers liked me, thought I was “so sweet,” but I couldn’t socially keep up; my Asics tennis shoes just didn’t stand up to their Jimmy Choo shoes. My handmade purse was a disgrace in the face of that black Prada bag. I didn’t have dad’s credit card to hop the train and drop a few grand on clothes in the city; none of my aunts or grandmothers had attended Vassar. I fought to survive; I tried to fit in, and knew that none of this really mattered, but I couldn’t even spend time with them because all they ever seemed to do was to spend money. Not to mention, I didn’t have the requisite attitude or the problems at home. And in this way I was almost grateful I didn’t fit in. Nevertheless, I stayed. I thought I needed to in order to be successful in later life; I needed this stamp of approval. More than that I wanted to succeed! I wanted the gratification of knowing that I accomplished what I set out to do. But everything eventually boiled down to nothing. I got A’s in class but I didn’t learn much as I wasn’t in the right state of mind to engage. I just went through the motions.
I sort of knew all of this in the back of my head, but I couldn’t let go of this place. I kept driving forward without knowing what I was after. Every path I chose seemed to lead to a dead end, and it frustrated me to no end. At this point in my life, I was probably furthest from myself, and yet I continued on because I thought I knew what was best for me. Only two more years. That’s nothing! But time dragged on as if it was forever. I felt that I needed this diploma more than anything, but I didn’t know why, and it was agony.
I remember my roommate saying to me, “Jennie Lynn, what’s wrong with you? You used to sing all the time. I kind of miss it.” I didn’t even know I had stopped singing; some cog inside of me seemed to have stopped working. Sara knew better than I did that I wasn’t happy. Then my dad visited me for October break, noticed something different about me, and nicely asked me if I wanted to take some time off. Oddly, this had never occurred to me. I was so caught up in the mire of soccer, work, homework, and people I didn’t understand that I never took the time to stand back and assess my options. When he asked me, my eyes uncontrollably metamorphosed into sink faucets. The most bizarre thing about it was my disconnection from that moment of release. I had learned to cut myself off from my emotions so much that I wasn’t even sad while these rivers of tears poured out of me. That was when I finally woke up to realize that I needed to let go of my hold on this place, let go of my pride, and move on. I decided to finish the semester and withdraw to take some time off and/or transfer. When I solidified this decision in my head, I remember my mind relaxing itself, sort of a melting feeling. I remember being happy for the first time in quite a while.
This was a glimpse. I was not completely detached from all desires, or perfectly at peace with who I was; however, I felt stillness in this moment of melting away from all the things I thought were requirements in my life. In this one instant I caught sight of some semblance of clarity; though I didn’t know what exactly was the next step, my insides at least communicated to me that I didn’t need to fit into the cookie cutter shape, and I was finally making the right decision. It took a few outside perspectives to make that happen, but it happened, which is what matters. Just as Krishna arrived in Arjuna’s time of need, my dad arrived on the scene when I needed guidance. Ironically, I even read The Bhagavad-Gita for my Religions of Asia class that very semester, but I treated it as separate from me rather than realizing it in me.
We learn as we go; we live and let go. It is precisely in this stillness and patience of letting go that we arrive at the place from which we can realize our center and dance. This is where the third step exists—in the dancing. Finally locating, understanding, and embodying our axes is when Kari karis and Jennie Lynn jennie lynns; this is when we become and carry out our very own verbs. Once we reach this level, we broach the lair of the divine. For once we happen upon our center, we inevitably encounter some form of God-given purpose. In The Dark Night of the Soul, John of the Cross writes:
The secret Kingdom of God is in the centre of the soul, or at the apex (pinnacle) of the intellect, where our soul becomes part of the Whole . . . This innermost centre, naked, lucid, free from the impression of any shape or form, is raised above all created things . . . and transcends all time and place, and in it the soul abides in a perpetual union and conjunction with God, her origin. (8)
Realizing that the divine exists within the center of our soul, we now understand the reason each glimpse of the self along the path of discovery seems itself an epiphany, a moment of clarity. When we experience these little moments of clarity during our struggle to understand ourselves, we are encountering very tiny glimpses through to the divine. Each little glimpse feels potentially epiphanic in the moment; possibly they are small epiphanies, but the large omnipotent epiphany is that final step towards which we are forever marching on our path to self-discovery.
We cannot all become divine within a lifetime, for that would mean that each and every one of us succeeded swimmingly without error. Only a select few will experience the grand epiphany of really knowing and becoming themselves as divine beings. The rest of us will get close enough to finding ourselves that we will begin to know ourselves in a very personal way. We all clamber towards the divine within ourselves by striving to find our purposes in life, but most of us will die before we get there. For this reason, it is only the process, not the end result, which counts.
We must remember the teachings of The Bhagavad-Gita. Krishna teaches Arjuna, “Be intent on action / not on the fruits of action; / avoid attraction to the fruits / and attachment to inaction!” (Stoler Miller 2.47). Krishna reminds us to focus on the task at hand, not the glorified fruits to which we aim. We cannot climb toward the divine and hope to succeed when self-interest is at hand. Instead we must remember step number two, kenosis, and continue our journey without involvement of our own ego. It is seemingly paradoxical and counterintuitive; however, we must not allow ourselves to be at the center while we search for the center of ourselves.
Lily, for example, by allowing her fear of what people may think of her painting to fall to the wayside, realizes that it “doesn’t matter.” And then she dances, and she lilys. Woolf writes, “She looked at her canvas; it was blurred. With a sudden intensity, as if she saw it clear for a second, she drew a line there, in the centre. It was done; it was finished. Yes, she thought, laying down her brush in extreme fatigue, I have had my vision” (209). Lily realizes that it is the process that matters, the stroke of clarity that gets thrown onto the canvas. She only sees her vision clearly for a second; and in this second, uninhibited, she nourishes the life of significant soil.
Though we may not be painters like Lily or warriors like Arjuna, all we can do is try to remember our meanings, try to arrive at our centers. We travel through these cycles of life trying to remember everything we have forgotten, trying to recover that sense of meaning that was so clear as a child. Eliot explains:
There is only the fight to recover what has been lost
And found and lost again and again: and now, under conditions
That seem unpropitious. But perhaps neither gain nor loss.
For us, there is only the trying. The rest is not our business. (EC 186-9)
Even though we may not achieve absolute clarity or absolute divinity within a life, we become a little bit more divine for having tried. But like Eliot says, all we can do is try; whatever comes of the trying is “not our business,” and we must leave it as such and dance through our lives without thought of where our dance may leave us.
At the end of a long life, we may, like Mrs. Ramsay in To the Lighthouse, ask ourselves what the meaning of it all was.
That was all—a simple question; one that tended to close in on one with years. The great revelation had never come. The great revelation perhaps never did come. Instead there were little daily miracles, illuminations, matches struck unexpectedly in the dark; here was one . . . Mrs. Ramsay saying, ‘Life stand still here’ . . . In the midst of chaos there was shape; this eternal passing and flowing (she looked at the clouds going and the leaves shaking) was struck into stability. (Woolf 161)
Again, this is not our business, and like Mrs. Ramsay realizes, we can only relish in the dance of life, the small daily happenings that weave in and out of our journey. These little miracles, “matches struck . . . in the dark,” light the way and help us, as individuals, to find our own spark of stability and meaning wherein we dance.

Works Cited:

Coelho, Paulo. The Alchemist. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1988.
Eliot, T.S. Four Quartets. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, 1943.
Grahame, Kenneth. The Wind in the Willows. London: Penguin Group, 2008.
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Poems and Prose. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1995.
St. John of the Cross. Dark Night of the Soul. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 1995.
Stoler Miller, Barbara. The Bhagavad-Gita. New York: Random House, 2004.
Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, 1989.

Monday, April 12, 2010

on the way

I'm so excited, my paper has direction and is flowing. my dancers are dancing through it. When I was at Abby's house on Saturday, she came trodding out of her room with some big white posterpapers. I think I looked at her funny and laughed, and she said something like, "For mapping!" Currently my cat is lovingly attacking my paper's poster, but I have to say this is the best and most useful idea for paper writing yet. I was able to map out my ideas and thoughts in one big area and have it all in front of me through the whole process. It really helps me stay focused and not stray off on tangents. So thanks Abby. It also helps me to remember where exactly I was, when I have forgotten or become distracted.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

my thesis exactly

This may seem sort of obvious to the outside world, but I've finally figured out exactly how I want to word my thesis:

"In order to dance, we must first find our still point."


Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Last Night dinner

OK so last night after the Dante/Eliot/Heraclitus/Joyce recitations, Abby and I threw around our paper topics, etc . . . over some food and wine. Erin's done with school, back from usc, but she helped us mull over some ideas and had some good buddhist insights as well. It was really fun and although our paper topics are entirely different, they converge somewhere in the midst of past, future, present.
We discussed the everlooming problem of how to find the now. What is the now. Is now detached from past and future? That seems to be the goal in letting go. When we walk, we must not be distracted from distraction by distraction, we must be present in the walk. Have you ever walked/driven somewhere and on arrival realized that you were completely consumed in your mind that you don't even remember the traveling process? It happens all the time. Interesting . . . because I don't consider it such an awful thing to get lost in the caverns and twisting tunnels of your mind. Seems like time well spent. But the point is that you're missing out on your life, the now, if you spend every moment mulling over the past or worrying about the future, tomorrow's to-do list, etc.
So that leaves us with aiming to separate the now from the past and the future. But here is where I cry out that this doesn't make sense. The past is all wound up in the future if you ask me. I don't think it's entirely possible to draw a clean line between the two/three. The future too I suppose is all wound up in the now. The choices one makes in the now will lead to the future path. So, Abby and I came to the conclusion that you can't just have the now, the cycle, the past, the future. All of it is one, a single, whole entity.
My paper deals with the still point. And now I just now realized on looking back to the line about the violin, that Eliot explained this all very explicitly, but I just didn't get it before. grr.

Not the stillness of the violin, while the note lasts,
Not that only, but the co-existence,
Or say that the end precedes the beginning,
And the end and the beginning were always there
Before the beginning and after the end.

My next obstacle is understanding where to find the still point. Abby was thinking the rose garden is part of it. I reread this passage, which I think helps clarify:

To be conscious is not to be in time
But only in time can the moment in the rose-garden,
The moment in the arbour where the rain beat,
The moment in the draughty church at smokefall
Be remembered; involved with past and future.
Only through time time is conquered.

So it's not just the rose-garden, but any place. It seems the place may not matter quite so much, as long as the "moment" in the "place" is remembered.

"our great cosmic watermark"

While I'm not sure that I'm perfectly clear on this subject, my favorite blog of the semester was Kevin's blog on inscape and instress. I really enjoyed hearing about inscape in class, getting to know the concept, but this blog took the cake.

The only question I have that remains is how to discover instress, how to pursue it? Must one practice detachment? Yes, likely, I would imagine . . . Also, I assume we do not need to go looking for our mysterious inscape but, rather, it is simply part of us that we must learn to notice/recognize—"our great cosmic watermark." What a great way to put it.
Once we have instressed our inscape, we can be sure that we are fulfilling our duties, contributing to the positive transformations of other sentient beings.
I realize that this leaks into the Emergent Lit class, but "instressing one's inscape" sounds a lot like Santiago's pursuit of his "Personal Legend" (the other way around actually.) At the end of The Alchemist, Coelho explains that the objective of life is to transform oneself into a better human being than one was at the start; this entails unearthing one's Personal Legend—the predestined, prewritten stamp of whatness given to you at birth.

Monday, April 5, 2010

An insight into my paper

My paper will focus on the still point. I want to discuss the still point that balances now, past, and present. Proust's cookie uses the still point in a cup of tea to draw upon the past to substantiate the now. For me, the still point is the epiphany, quiet in its grandeur.
I was away for the weekend (also away from internet like Zuzu) . . . but I had been talking to my parents about this paper and how I was interested in Proust's tea/cookie as some sort of structural foundation from which my paper would/could spring. They drove into town and surprised me with a box of petite madeleines. So we made tea after dinner and experienced the cookies.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Final Paper is your duty and your sacred duty.

Must be the best thing you've ever written.
Final papers can include but are not limited to the following:
  • revelations/epiphanies
  • summative thoughts
  • visions
  • practical thoughts
Make use of:
  • simile
  • metaphor
  • figurative language
Paper presentations will be in reverse chronological order of the sections of Eliot's poem. In other words, if you were part of the Little Gidding group, you are first, so get a move on! :) I believe the first day of paper presentations is April 12th.

Recitations of Four Quartets will be held the last day of class.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Act I - ghost encounter


Hamlet's first encounter with his father's ghost mirrors the resurrection of Christ.

"Why thy canonized bones, hearsed in death,
Have burst their cerements, why the sepulcher*
Wherein we saw thee quietly inurned
Hath oped his ponderous and marble jaws,
To cast thee up again." (47-51)

Not only the scene, but also the language carries an extremely religious tone. "thy canonized bones."
It's interesting to put this scene in a religious context because then one realizes that the Father, Son, and (Holy) Ghost/Spirit come together all in one, under the name Hamlet. King, Prince, and Ghost.
Father/son relationships echo in To The Lighthouse and the Bhagavad Gita as well, taking an interesting twist in the Bhagavad Gita. James feels no obligation whatsoever towards his father; in fact, he'd like to kill him (though he does essentially just desire approval from his father.) Hamlet passionately desires to avenge Claudius in his father's name. Arjuna, however finds himself facing battle, restrained under the bonds of filial piety, the ultimate duty and devotion to one's father, family, and people above all else. Trying to listen to two opposites in his religious path, Arjuna feels conflict. How does one choose between Krishna and the values of filial piety taught from a young age? In eastern culture, respect for one's father is the very very highest virtue attainable.
Sadly, the respect for filial relationships seems to have deteriorated over the centuries. Strong ties remain between father/son, but James, for example, feels no pity for his father simply because he is his father. Rather, James judges his father only as a person, with no bias for his role as father.

Just a picture I looked up when Hamlet says that his fate makes his strength as great as the Nemean Lion's:

What Matters?

For me, the most clear answer to "what matters?" is given when Lily sits on the lawn frustrated, searching for the problem that evades her. "Here sitting on the world, she thought, for she could not shake herself free from the sense that everything this morning was happening for the first time, perhaps for the last time . . ." (194). Though she doesn't entirely realize what is going on, Lily somehow knows within herself the importance of lending strong focus to everything that happens to her. The feeling that she is knowing things for the first time and, somehow, simultaneously the last gives her reason to appreciate her experiences, pay attention to them. When we really engage with our lives and experiences; this is when we find the glimpses, the clarifying moments. And thus, this is what leads her to finally finish her painting.

More epiphanies in TTL

I went a bit overboard with To The Lighthouse. There was a bit in the middle that, I admit, lost me, however the rest, to me, was brilliant. The plot is not meant to move forward enticingly; the plot, rather, is Time. What are we doing within the confines of Time? Each person occupies their own space in time; each character carries the story in rapture. The nuances in thought to which one isn't often privy intrigue me. The waves mesmerize me; each character's imagination and sense of self move wavelike through the book, ending where they begin. For example, James has the desire to kill his father right at the front of the book (this could be the peak of the wave); then this wave lulls for the reader, but again peaks at the end when James thinks, "I shall take a knife and strike him to the heart" (184). Lily frustrates me a bit because she fears herself so much. But we all fear ourselves, or fail to trust ourselves, at some point; the key is the overcoming, in which she suddenly frees herself from perceived judgment and has her "vision!"
Lily's vision at the end marks the time when she sees beyond the empty steps, the blurred canvas, the day to day, the fact that her painting will someday be rolled up beneath a sofa, to the clarity of herself, who she is. Though this is her culminating moment of realization, the extensive array of small glimpses of clarity throughout are equally imperative.
Each day, we pass through our routines, and sometimes find ourselves a bit stuck (just as the Ramsays are on the Isle of Skye). But in the midst of the seemingly mundane, every once in a while, one glimpses the meaningful, a small moment that jolts us from our ignorance and enables us to see the importance of the little events in our lives that happen every day.
". . . Mrs. Ramsay sitting with James in the window and the cloud moving and the tree bending, how life, from being made up of little separate incidents which one lived one by one, became curled and whole like a wave which bore one up with it and threw one down with it, there, with a dash on the beach" (47). All of these simple events, when drawn together form the lives we live; though sometimes one might think life grand and daunting, it all comes back to the rustling of trees, the drive to work, the conversation held in the back yard.
I appreciate Woolf's insight regarding the uniqueness of persons. "How did she differ? What was the spirit in her, the essential thing, by which, had you found a crumpled glove in the corner of a sofa, you would have known it, from its twisted finger, hers indisputably?" (49). Sometimes I think about myself and wonder why I'm me. I think about the biology of my brain, and how it can possibly generate thoughts that vary from the thoughts that other brains produce. Mrs. Ramsay's meditation on the subject nails it down pretty relatably. "To be silent; to be alone. All the being and the doing, expansive, glittering, vocal, evaporated; and one shrunk, with a sense of solemnity, to being oneself, a wedge-shaped core of darkness, something invisible to others" (62). I'm not exactly sure where to take this, but it definitely relates to Kevin's ruminations on Hopkins' inscape. It's also quite existential which I'll get into more later.
---
During dinner, Woolf provides this vision:
". . . for the night was now shut off by panes of glass, which, far from giving any accurate view of the outside world, rippled it so strangely that here, inside the room, seemed to be order and dry land; there, outside, a reflection in which things wavered and vanished, waterily. Some change at once went through them all, as if this had really happened, and they were all conscious of making a party together in a hollow, on an island; had their common cause against that fluidity out there" (97). It is dreamlike and generates a sense of illusion. How do we distinguish between real and imagination? Woolf says, "as if this had really happened." So, did it?
What a wild moment when Mrs. Ramsay focuses in on the fleeting nature of time and of things. "With her foot on the threshold she waited a moment longer in a scene which was vanishing even as she looked, and then, as she moved and took Minta's arm and left the room, it changed, it shaped itself differently; it had become, she knew, giving one last look at it over her shoulder, already the past" (111). The room seems to morph in front of her eyes. Things are always changing, but we forget to take notice.
-------------
The following remark carries a Biblical tone:
"He covers his treasures in a drench of hail, and so breaks them, so confuses them that it seems impossible that their calm should ever return or that we should ever compose from their fragments a perfect whole or read in the littered pieces the clear words of truth. For our penitence deserves a glimpse only; our toil respite only" (128). The harms and harshness of life must exist to keep man within his realm. Men only glimpse the divine, the anagogic. For this reason, there are seasons and cycles of death and rebirth. Our world is not divine perfection, but rather operates in a constant state of change that rolls us through both suffering and success.

The third chapter, for me, focuses solidly on inscape. "What does one do? Why is one sitting here, after all?" (146). It brings me back to my post on Marcus Aurelius.
"17. In human life time is but a point, reality a flux, perception indistinct, the composition of the body subject to easy corruption, the soul a spinning top, fortune hard to make out, fame confused. To put it briefly: physical things are but a flowing stream, things of the soul dreams and vanity; life is but a struggle and the visit to a strange land, posthumous fame but a forgetting." (Aurelius 16-7)
I think Lily feels like a spinning top in the third chapter especially. When Mr. Ramsay craves her sympathy, all she manages to do is stand there stupefied until she blurts out "What beautiful boots!" of all things. She cannot launch out from her comfort zone because she is afraid of who she is; she fears her painting, her reality, her purpose in life.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Helen

I finally realized in my attempt to read this mythically that Mrs. Ramsay is Helen, the face that launched a thousand ships, born of the following:


Evelyn deMorgan's interpretation of Helen:

Isles of Skye sigh

In my opinion, the first epiphany (or opposite epiphany?) occurs when Mr. Carmichael, "basking with his yellow cat's eyes ajar, so that like a cat's they seemed to reflect the branches moving or the clouds passing, but to give no inkling of any inner thoughts or emotion whatsoever," murmurs that he needs nothing from town. We realize later that he has consumed opium when we see the "vivid streak of canary-yellow in moustache and beard that were otherwise milk white" (10). One can only imagine he has some sort of out-of-body experience despite his exterior lethargy.
When Mr. Tansley and Mrs. Ramsay come out on the quay, and he is overcome by her beauty, we are introduced to a very unique experience he has. "Under the influence of that extraordinary emotion which had been growing all the walk, had begun in the garden when he had wanted to take her bag, had increased in the town when he had wanted to tell her everything about himself, he was coming to see himself, and everything he had ever known gone crooked a little. It was awfully strange" (13). This experience reminded me of what Kari spoke of in class on Wednesday, seeing everything she looked at as crooked for about an hour and a half. If I remember correctly this epiphany was the result of spending four hours looking at Salvador Dali (and possibly others.) When she mentioned Dali (if it was her,) I thought of this painting:

For me, this painting embodies Mrs. Ramsay (though possibly younger and without James.) It is very different from Lily's painting, and yet, it too lacks the lighthouse (which Lily does eventually add with a flourish.)
Back to Mr. Tansley's epiphany. . . After the previous moment of seeing things crookedly and not quite understanding why, he finally realizes, when he sees her standing "quite motionless for a moment against a picture of Queen Victoria wearing the blue ribbon of the Garter" that "it was this: it was this:—she was the most beautiful person he had ever seen.
Mrs. Ramsay: We hear the waves "like a ghostly roll of drums remorselessly beat the measure of life." They "warned her whose day had slipped past in one quick doing ofter another that it was all ephemeral as a rainbow—this sound which had been obscured and concealed under the other sounds suddenly thundered hollow in her ears and made her look up with an impulse of terror" (16). Because the sound of the waves are this terrifying to Mrs. Ramsay, their presence takes the utmost sense of awful in this moment. In all other moments I would imagine the sea as beautiful (even if it was turbulent) simply because it is the sea, and because seas are full of wonder. But in this moment, the moment one realizes that the waves never stop pounding against the shore, never stop beating out the remorseless measure of life, the sea is the most terrible entity one can imagine.
I also saw a mini epiphany (which I can't quite explain the nature of why exactly it is epiphanic) when Lily and William are standing in front of her painting. "But something moved, flashed, turned a silver wing in the air" (19). A bird. Why does Woolf put this in? And then off they stroll . . .

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Also (my second also)

I found it quite funny and somewhat frighteningly strange that Hopkins had this to say in a letter to Robert Bridges regarding RL Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde:

"You speak of the 'gross absurdity' of the interchange. Enough that it is impossible and might perhaps have been a little better masked: it must be connived at, and it gives rise to a fine situation. It is not more impossible than fairies, giants, heathen gods, and lots of things that literature teems with—and none more than yours. You are certainly wrong about Hyde being overdrawn: my Hyde is worse."

Inversnaid

ALSO... I'd like to add this as I really enjoy the following poem by Hopkins:

Inversnaid
THIS darksome burn, horseback brown,
His rollrock highroad roaring down,
In coop and in comb the fleece of his foam
Flutes and low to the lake falls home.

A windpuff-bonnet of fáwn-fróth 5
Turns and twindles over the broth
Of a pool so pitchblack, féll-frówning,
It rounds and rounds Despair to drowning.

Degged with dew, dappled with dew
Are the groins of the braes that the brook treads through, 10
Wiry heathpacks, flitches of fern,
And the beadbonny ash that sits over the burn.

What would the world be, once bereft
Of wet and of wildness? Let them be left,
O let them be left, wildness and wet; 15
Long live the weeds and the wilderness yet.

Wordsworth, Hopkins, and Eliot

Tintern Abbey brings me to ponder a child's attention span. Often, we dismiss a child's capacity to concentrate on any one thing for any significant period of time. However, I tend to think that children, in comparison to most adults, have the superior capacity to focus, especially around the ages of 6-8. Wordsworth says, "For I have learned to look on nature, not as in the hour of thoughtless youth." Hmm. Yes, I see where he comes from. Maybe he means youth as in my age currently . . . likely, I suppose.
But have you ever seen a child counting steps, counting stairs, picking flowers, asking why? Trust me, their why's long outlast the mother's patience for answering; they linger on the stairs counting, pondering, examining dirt, whereas the adult climbs the stairs to get to the top and most often fails to note anything extraordinary about the trip up. I remember watching the river when I was young, noting the ripples and the clarity. I also remember caking myself with mud by the creek, laying in the sun until it dried, then getting up very slowly feeling the cracking outer skin I had given myself. I remember sitting in the grass observing little yellow flowers with my friend Micah; I remember talking about how we were afraid of dying, because Claire drowned in the creek behind our house (and yet we still took our annual innertube escapade through the pipe that ran under the driveway . . . always a bit scary and claustrophobic, yet nonetheless thrilling.) I remember ice skating with Micah in our back yard in the winter. But were all these communions with nature thoughtless? I suppose they might have been in the sense that Wordsworth is getting at. Children cannot typically see "the still, sad music of humanity" in the same way of adults. Regardless, children see other things. Also, I think you'd find yourself hard pressed to note an adult sitting out in the grass waiting for ants to surface for viewing pleasure.

The following is my favorite section of the poem Tintern Abbey:
"These beauteous forms,
Through a long absence, have not been to me
As is a landscape to a blind man's eye:
But oft, in lonely rooms, and 'mid the din
Of towns and cities, I have owed to them
In hours of weariness, sensations sweet,
Felt in the blood, and felt along the heart;
And passing even into my purer mind,
With tranquil restoration: -- feelings too
Of unremembered pleasure: such, perhaps,
As have no slight or trivial influence
On that best portion of a good man's life,
His little, nameless, unremembered, acts
Of kindness and of love. Nor less, I trust,
To them I may have owed another gift,
Of aspect more sublime; that blessed mood,
In which the burthen of the mystery,
In which the heavy and the weary weight
Of all this unintelligible world,
Is lightened: -- that serene and blessed mood,
In which the affections gently lead us on, --
Until, the breath of this corporeal frame
And even the motion of our human blood
Almost suspended, we are laid asleep
In body, and become a living soul:
While with an eye made quiet by the power
Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,
We see into the life of things."

Unremembered pleasures. Corporeal frame. We see into the life of things.
From Nabokov's transparent things to Hopkins' inscape.
Inscape...

James Finn Cotter, in his article "'Hornlight Wound to the West': The Inscape of the Passion in Hopkins' Poetry," says that "Hopkins saw inscape as the perception of images in art and nature which open to and link up with other images in order to form a pattern or design not at first detectable" (299).

Cotter confuses me. However, Cotter's words become more clear with the help of Stephen Greenblatt's explanation via wiki: "[Hopkins] felt that everything in the universe was characterized by what he called inscape, the distinctive design that constitutes individual identity. This identity is not static but dynamic. Each being in the universe 'selves,' that is, enacts its identity. And the human being, the most highly selved, the most individually distinctive being in the universe, recognizes the inscape of other beings in an act that Hopkins calls instress, the apprehension of an object in an intense thrust of energy toward it that enables one to realize specific distinctiveness. Ultimately, the instress of inscape leads one to Christ, for the individual identity of any object is the stamp of divine creation on it."

I think it's extremely important that inscape is not static, but dynamic, especially in terms of better understanding Wordsworth's words "I cannot paint what then I was" (Tintern Abbey.) Although we remain the same being throughout life, our inscape shifts and varies its enactment of self. The pattern shifts and moves alongside of other patterns and beings/selves? (ugh I feel that I'm stabbing at thin air.)

Ok.. here's an attempt to look at patterns in Eliot:

BN
There they were as our guests, accepted and accepting.
So we moved, and they, in a formal pattern,
Along the empty alley, into the box circle,
To look down into the drained pool.

Only by the form, the pattern,
Can words or music reach
The stillness, as a Chinese jar still
Moves perpetually in its stillness.

The detail of the pattern is movement,
As in the figure of the ten stairs.

EC
The knowledge imposes a pattern, and falsifies,
For the pattern is new in every moment
And every moment is a new and shocking
Valuation of all we have been.

Home is where one starts from. As we grow older
The world becomes stranger, the pattern more complicated
Of dead and living.

DS
It seems, as one becomes older,
That the past has another pattern, and ceases to be a mere sequence—

LG
See, now they vanish,
The faces and places, with the self which, as it could, loved them,
To become renewed, transfigured, in another pattern.

A people without history
Is not redeemed from time, for history is a pattern
Of timeless moments.

If, as Cotter says, inscape reveals patterns not at first discernable, then patterns must comprise at least part of the unique whatness of a thing. As Eliot shows, patterns shift, move change. They, too, are not static.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Marcus Aurelius

I went to the library Monday to do some research on Pater. I found an article on his Renaissance by Jeffrey Wallen called "Alive in the Grave: Walter Pater's Renaissance." Though I very much enjoy the title, I am not inordinately thrilled with the content (maybe not so much the content exactly, but the style of the writing?). Anyhow, I went ahead and checked out the book itself as well. Then I found Marcus Aurelius (I am a fan of his Meditations.) I checked it out since my copy got lost somewhere in Poughkeepsie. Though the entire book is relevant, below are just a few select passages. I apologize for such extensive quoting, but some things must be done (it is just so good.)

"17. In human life time is but a point, reality a flux, perception indistinct, the composition of the body subject to easy corruption, the soul a spinning top, fortune hard to make out, fame confused. To put it briefly: physical things are but a flowing stream, things of the soul dreams and vanity; life is but a struggle and the visit to a strange land, posthumous fame but a forgetting." (Aurelius 16-7)

Only just a little bleak, just like Eliot. Time is now, but life is just a struggle that is essentially lost to the world at some point. We all decay. We all are doomed to decay. Stephen ruminates in Ulysses:
"Bag of corpsegas sopping in foul brine. A quiver of minnows, fat of a spongy tidbit, flash through the slits of his buttoned trouserfly. God becomes man becomes fish becomes barnacle goose becomes featherbed mountain. Dead breaths I living breathe, tread dead dust, devour a ruinous offal from all dead. Hauled stark over the gunwale he breathes upward the stench of his green grave, his leprous nosehole snoring to the sun" (Joyce 41-2).

Talk about decay! Though he didn't sleep in his coffin nightly, Stephen reminded himself of his corporeality frequently and mercilessly.
"At the still point of the turning world. Neither flesh nor fleshless; Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance is . . ." (Eliot 15-6)
The dance of death? or the dance of life? Dr. Sexson keeps mentioning the Tibetan Book of the Dead. I had only been familiar with the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying.

In class, Dr. Sexson mentioned the Four Noble Truths. (Thanks to sasana.org:)
1. All life knows suffering. Nobody gets what they want out of life.
2. The cause of suffering is ignorance and clinging. Wanting it is the problem.
3. There is a way to end suffering. By learning not to want it.
4. This is the way to end suffering: The Eightfold Path.
1. Right Understanding Learning the nature of reality and the truth about life.
2. Right Aspiration Making the commitment to living in such a way that our suffering can end.
3. Right Effort Just Do It. No Excuses.
4. Right Speech Speaking the truth in a helpful and compassionate way.
5. Right Conduct Living a life consistent with our values.
6. Right Livelihood Earning a living in a way that doesn’t hurt others.
7. Right Mindfulness Recognizing the value of the moment; living where we are.
8. Right Concentration Expanding our consciousness through meditation.
"right action" (Eliot)

Along a similar vein, I like that Pat brought up koans in his presentation. Koans drive me nuts. They are a question or riddle. However, koans do not have answers(even if they do.) For me this delves into Kevin's ponderance on paradoxes in a recent blog. As far as actually answering a koan, the key is to admit that you do not know the answer, nor can you ever know the answer. You see my Western frustration. I get it though. I understand that enlightenment comes in the form of letting go, emptying out (not feeling obliged to have answers for all, not feeling distressed at not knowing.) Kenosis. Autumn.

Example koans:
What is the color of wind?
What is the sound of one hand clapping?

M. Aurelius again:
"33. We shall very soon be only ashes or dry bones, merely a name or not even a name, while a name in any case is only a noise and an echo. The things much honored in life are vain, corruptible, and of no import. The living are like puppies who bite, or quarrelsome children who laugh and then immediately weep. Faith and Reverence and Justice and Truth "have left the wide-pathed earth for Heaven."11 What is it which holds us here, if indeed the objects of sense are ever changing and last not, the senses themselves are blurred and variable as wax, our soul is but an exhalation from the blood, and good repute among such is vain? What holds us? To await death with good grace, whether it be extinction or a going elsewhere. And until the time for it comes, what suffices? What else but to honor the gods and praise them, to do good to men, bear with them and forbear. As for all that lies within the limits of mere flesh and mere life, remember that none of it belongs to you or is within your power." (47)

Why do we go on living when we see the inevitable death? Aurelius references a passage from Hesiod's Works and Days that details Aidos (Reverence) and Nemesis abandoning the earth to return to Olympus. So why don't we choose this path, the path into the rose garden through the door that was never opened.

I suppose Eliot answers this in his own way at the end of the Dry Salvages section. "And right action is freedom from past and future also. For most of us, this is the aim never here to be realized; who are only undefeated because we have gone on trying; we, content at the last if our temporal reversion nourish (not so far from the yew-tree) the life of significant soil" (45). As Aurelius points out that "none of it belongs to you or is within your power," all we can do is water the earth, the significant soil, with our contributions.

Things change, Kundun.
"21. Before long you will not be anybody or exist anywhere, nor will any of the things you now see, or anyone of those now living. For all things are by nature intended to change, to be altered and destroyed, in order that other things in their turn may come to be." (Aurelius 126)
In my opinion this is the key to epiphany. All things are meant to change. When a sudden change or shift occurs, so does an epiphany. Stasis does not bode well for the livelihood of epiphanies. There must be change to foster them. Also, in my opinion, when a manifestation of clarity, beauty, or even darkness occurs to a person, his or her brain is forever changed.

So where did Pater go? next blog I suppose.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Botticelli's Primavera


Left to right: Mercury, the Three Graces, Venus, Flora, Chloris, Zephyrus.

  • Mercury, also Hermes the trickster
  • The Three Graces: Aglaea (goddess of beauty), Euphrosyne (goddess of mirth), and Thalia (goddess of good cheer)-- all three are associated with the underworld and the Eleusinian mysteries
  • Venus, also Aphrodite, goddess of love
  • Flora, goddess of flowers and springtime (also Chloris)
  • Chloris (Greek version of Flora)
  • Zephyrus, west wind, fructifying wind, bringer of springtime

Dry Salvages (Images)


Neal T. Walsh


Leonardo da Vinci (Uffizi, Florence, Italy)


Note the rose-like inverted center.
To me, it looks like a little dancing lady. " . . . at the still point, there the dance is" (BN 63).

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Sestina

I just read an article on JSTOR by Tahita Fulkerson about Eliot's sestina in Dry Salvages at the beginning of section II. She cites the Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, calling the sestina the "most complicated of . . . verse forms."
Here is a link to the article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111675

Via wiki: "A sestina (also, sextina, sestine, or sextain) is a highly structured poem consisting of six six-line stanzas followed by a tercet (called its envoy or tornada), for a total of thirty-nine lines. The same set of six words ends the lines of each of the six-line stanzas, but in a different order each time."

However, Eliot seems to stray from the traditional sestina because he completely omits the tercet at the end. He also does not change the order of the ending words of each line. Rather, he maintains the order, 123456, but slightly modifies the word that ends each line.
For example, the first stanza's first line ends with the word wailing; the second stanza's first line ends with trailing. Upon reaching the first line of the sixth stanza, Eliot brings us full circle back to the word wailing.

Here are the cycles of the last words of each of the six stanzas:
1st line: wailing, trailing, failing, sailing, bailing, wailing
2nd: flowers, hours, powers, cowers, lowers, flowers
3rd: motionless, emotionles, devotionless, oceanless, erosionless, motionless
4th: wreckage, breakage, leakage, wastage, dockage, wreckage
5th: unprayable, reliable, undeniable, liable, unpayable, prayable
6th: annunciation, renunciation, annunciation, destination, examination, Annunciation.

Where is there an end of it, the soundless wailing,
The silent withering of autumn flowers
Dropping their petals and remaining motionless;
Where is there an end to the drifting wreckage,
The prayer of the bone on the beach, the unprayable
Prayer at the calamitous annunciation?

There is no end, but addition: the trailing
Consequence of further days and hours,
While emotion takes to itself the emotionless
Years of living among the breakage
Of what was believed in as the most reliable
And therefore the fittest for renunciation.

There is the final addition, the failing
Pride or resentment at failing powers,
The unattached devotion which might pass for devotionless,
In a drifting boat with a slow leakage,
The silent listening to the undeniable
Clamour of the bell of the last annunciation.

Where is the end of them, the fisherman sailing
Into the wind's tail, where the fog cowers?
We cannot think of a time that is oceanless
Or of an ocean not littered with wastage
Or of a future that is not liable
Like the past, to have no destination.

We have to think of them as forever bailing,
Setting and hauling, while the North East lowers
Over shallow banks unchanging and erosionless
Or drawing their money, drying sails at dockage;
Not as making a trip that will be unpayable
For a haul that will not bear examination.

There is no end of it, the voiceless wailing,
No end to the withering of withered flowers,
To the movement of pain that is painless and motionless,
To the drift of the sea and the drifting wreckage,
The bone's prayer to Death its God. Only the hardly, barely prayable
Prayer of the one Annunciation.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Mom, Look!


You know the feeling when you first realize you're riding your bike (sans training wheels) and Dad's not holding on anymore?
For me, it was definitely an epiphany.

Ha, this kid definitely had some sort of epiphanic moment to make him act like Actaeon.

E Bishop & Epiphanies

I'm frustrated that the library does not have any of the articles I would like to read accessible online.
Here are the url's if anyone is interested and knows how to access them:
"Pater's Epiphanies and the Open Form" by Jay B. Losey
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3189653

"The Purpose and Permanence of the Joycean Epiphany" by David Hayman
http://www.jstor.org/pss/25473944

"From Pater to Wilde to Joyce: Modernist Epiphany and the Soulful Self" by John McGowan
(lost url sorry)
Also, this might be an interesting read:

I was, however, able to access an article by Martin Bidney that deals with Elizabeth Bishop and epiphanies.

I'm not sure I entirely understand Bidney's technique in studying the epiphany, but I do like his contention that "each epiphany maker establishes a uniquely individual recurrent pattern that correlates with a personal configuration of psychological concerns, fears, and desires. In creating epiphanies . . . one becomes most intensely who one is."

Books I couldn't put down



I think it was in 5th grade that I discovered a certain zeal for The Hobbit. I couldn't put it down! And then I read it again and possibly a third time. I had a similar experience with Matilda (but for very different reasons.) The Hobbit mesmerized me by inciting my imagination. I could so clearly see Bilbo and his little house in a small little hillock in a very perfectly green valley. I remember seeing the roundness of his house and the roundness of his door; and, of course, the movie disappointed me because that is NOT at all how Bilbo's abode should have looked.



Matilda. Unfortunately, I don't remember my version of Matilda because the movie seems to have bumped her out of my head. That's sad! Hmm. I know i know i know i know this is almost always the case, but the book is FAR better than the movie version. In fact, I loathe the movie in comparison to the novel.
Matilda mesmerizes me because of the way she can apply her mind. Don't think I'm too crazy, but I do think the mind is extremely powerful if we allow it to be. I'm not saying that I, myself, can tip over a glass of water with my mind, I'm just saying I don't think we have learned to use our minds to the full extent. Ok you can call me crazy.
I liked Matilda because of her precocious manner and for the fact that she would spend so much time in the library.

Superbowl & Enlightenment

Happy Supersalsabowl day. I'm not a football fan, I'm more the other kind of futbol fan. Come to think of it, I don't actually know who's playing today. I suppose I will enlighten myself before I head over to a friend's for the big game.

On to enlightenment. I know I make a radical jump from football to Eliot, but I will say that a football has four quarters just like the quartets. I think it's just a nice, symmetrically asthetic way to divide up most anything.
Every time I read passages from the Four Quartets, I feel a bit more enlightened. The first time I read it, I thought Ok this is beautiful. Since then, I seem to have little 'ahs' of recognition where I focus in on a small piece that begins to make sense. Today I like this section:

V
So here I am, in the middle way, having had twenty years-
Twenty years largely wasted, the years of l'entre deux guerres
Trying to learn to use words, and every attempt
Is a wholly new start, and a different kind of failure
Because one has only learnt to get the better of words
For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which
One is no longer disposed to say it. And so each venture
Is a new beginning, a raid on the inarticulate
With shabby equipment always deteriorating
In the general mass of imprecision of feeling,
Undisciplined squads of emotion. (30-1)

How often does one struggle to find the words to encompass what one feels? I personally will settle for a word that serves to get the overall point across because I know that anything else is futile. I've tried before to explain an extreme emotion I felt from a book, a song, a sunset, etc, and the response typically is "mhmmm." It is so Frustrating! They have no idea what you felt because they didn't.
Only rarely can one share an experience with another, and usually the sharing does not come in the form of words.
Words can explain the mundane, but they can only stretch and reach and attempt to explain the extreme.
Now it seems fitting to make my own attempt to flesh out an understanding of epiphany. I do like what Ellmann says of Joyce's epiphany in his Ulysses on the Liffey though I don't have his book in front of me at this moment. It was something about a "sudden turn about." There comes a moment when one must suddenly shift one's mind to comprehend that which mundane words cannot. One's mind seems to shift out of the world of words (seeing that they are incapable) and into a realm that occupies a level that does not have a word (excepting the word 'epiphanic.') In my opinion, epiphanies are mesmeric because they have no words. How often do we get to experience something and not talk about it?
Words take up every day all the time. We are always introducing words to say something, mean something, tick away the clock.
So then, without words, we can pause the clock and have a wordless moment that means more than a thousand words.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Groundhog Day-feb2

I woke up with a jolt to say the least. I am usually not too deep a sleeper come about 6am, but Feb 2 was different. It was 8am, and Reid, holding our cat Gosu, said, "I missed class!" I had intended to get up at 6 with him in honor of Groundhog day, but both of us slept straight through his alarm. After talking to Sam, I realize I am 1/2 way redeemed because I woke at 8 to honor Bloomsday (even though that's Jun16.)? Anyhow, I made myself a breakfast sandwich like i do every morning - 2 eggs, 2 pieces bacon, 1 bagel. Then, I sat down with coffee and did a few hours of homework. 19th c. british literature at 11am. I parked on 3rd street where i always park, slipped a few times on the icy sidewalks where no one shovels the snow, and then talked about binaries in "The Coming Race" for 1.25 hrs. After class my shakespeare group met on a porch on 13th street and read Much ado about nothing outloud. my feet froze. Gave 2 people rides back to campus. Visited the bookstore to purchase more texts for class. Someone tried to be overly helpful.
Drove home. by this time it is nearly 2pm. Reid and i went to laparilla for a blackwater bayou and 1jambalaya, then to smiths for the atm machine. then home again. had a long conversation about careers and how on earth we were to make use of our majors (his being physics, mine obviously being lit.) I then read ulysses for a few hours before receiving a text message from abby asking if i was at sams yet. at 7pm we met at sams to watch the skin of our teeth over a few glasses of malbec, and to be reminded that today was just yesterday all over again. we watched sabina run the show and discussed how inordinately funny it would be if the actors could ever actually make the audience truly believe that the entire cast had fallen ill due to food poisoning. Olie watched sam's feet and growled and barked. Copper snuggled with abby and by the end of the play was in bliss with a wonderful mohawk hairdo. then sutter taught us about ineluctable modality, diaphane and adiaphane, snotgreen - the mother inside of us, and all in only 1 paragraph! the beginning of proteus, stephen's walk by the water.
sutter and sam gifted me my very own copy of finnegans wake that i can write in! THANk YOU.
Drove home with 1 headlight - need to get that fixed. Read more ulysses and shakespeare. went to bed.
And after all that, i still didn't get everything done I needed to get done.
Happy anniversary Dr. Sexson

Monday, February 1, 2010

music up above

When Gabriel stands at the base of the stairs and watches Gretta in a silhouetted light listening to the music from the floor above her, I realized that there was some sanity amidst the drama and bustle of this annual dinner.

Also, if you've ever listened to the muted sounds of music from another room, they often seem unworldly. One hears different notes, etc. than one would ordinarily notice.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

the hardy boys


Yes, I read them. All of them.

I remember one day reading one of those mysteries and happening upon the word 'chaos.' I was in the car on the way to violin lessons with my mom and my sister. I said the word aloud. Ciao-s. Like goodbye in Italian with an ess tacked on to the end. Like house, but ch-ow-se.
"Spell it," my mom said.
"c-h-a-o-s."
"Kay-oss," my mom laughed.

I went home after violin and looked up 'chaos' in our dictionary. I had heard the word a million times in spoken language, but I had never seen it on the page. The lightbulb went on.

I was talking to Abby the other day about learning new words. I remember being able to broaden my vocabulary when I was younger without nearly as much effort as I must put in at my age now. Why is that? Regardless, it's frustrating. I can look up a word here and there and yet, still, I can forget it. But when I looked up words when I was younger, they stuck, and I didn't have to look them up multiple times.

English Major

My spindly silvery-haired wart of an advisor advised me that non-science majors were highly sought after in medical schools (for diversity's sake, of course.) I do think he is right, and I was definitely glad to hear it as I was dreading what might fall from his droopy mouth when I brought him the paperwork for "Drama Major, pre-med requisites."
"Ahh," he said, barraged me with questions, then finally signed it.
Upon viewing an awful rendition of Romeo & Juliet (yes, entirely possible) and sampling some of the department's classes, I decided that I would rescind my application to the drama department. Seeing that one was not required to formally declare one's major until Jr. year, I left it open and took a smattering of classes in religion, philosophy, chemistry, biology, art, you get the point. Slightly un-focused? Oh, but it was fun, and I wouldn't take it back for the world.
Though it was intellectually stimulating, I was sad there to say the least, so I transferred. The only reason I was sad to leave was because I would miss my professors and I because I had been chosen as a daisy.



Anyhow, I was a little hesitant about moving to Bozeman. It's wild what people will fill your ear with if they are loyal to Mssla.
And finally, to the unfolding of my English major. I had decided before registration that I was going to be a Lit. major, end of story. Why? I like stories. Forget the whole doctor thing. I remember scrolling through the names of English professors, wondering about these people. I tried to imagine them from their names. I thought Sexson might be extremely tall, dry, and overly serious, and I envisioned Minton with oval glasses and long brown hair. Of course in the end, even though I imagined them incorrectly, I apparently typed in the right CRN's because I stumbled into some great people without many hiccups.
And so I took:

CHEM 131 Chemistry I TA 3.530 marianne begemann
ELEC 100 Western Drama TB 3.530
ELEC 100IA Art of Film TB 3.530
ELEC 100IH Western Philosophy I TB+ 3.530 michael murray
ELEC 100RA Drawing/Design TA 3.530 gina ruggeri
ELEC 100RN Biology I TB+ 3.530
ELEC 200 Post Colonial Literature TB 3.530
ELEC 200 Buddhist Monastery Intern TP 1.765 rick e.h. jarow
ELEC 200D Religions of Asia TB+ 3.530 rick e.h. jarow
ENGL 121W Travel Writing TB 3.530 amitava kumar
MLF 101 French 1 TA- 3.530 paul fenouillet
MLF 102D French 2 TA 3.530 paul fenouillet
PSY 100IS Intro to Psychology TA- 3.530
---TRANSF---
ART 111RA UG 3-D Art Fundamentals
CHEM 132 UG General Chemistry II
CLS 201US UG Knowledge and Community
ENGL 123IH UG Introduction to Literary Study
ENGL 221 UG College Writing II porter
ENGL 238 UG Struct & Funct of Language
MATH 160Q UG Precalculus sabrina
ENGL 213 UG Classical Fndtns of Literature sexson
ENGL 216 UG British Literature I minton
ENGL 217 UG British Literature II
ENGL 300 UG Surv of Lit Criticism
PHYS 221 UG Honors Gen & Mod Phys I

and this semester it's:
-Shakespeare
-Emergent Lit
-Epiphanies of course
-Independent study Ulysses
-Nutrition
-Early American Lit
-19th c British Lit

When I consider what really drew me to become an English major, I recall my childhood, which was entirely full of books. I relish hearing the story of when I read my first word. And of course I also love watching the video that my Grandma made of my sister and I strutting our reading skills for the camera. It's quite comical. I'm sitting on the piano bench wearing a neon orange headband, solo at first, reading some story to the camera in a whiny 6 yr. old voice. Next thing you know, Lauren runs in with a pile of books and shoves her way onto the bench next to me. I try to push her off but am eventually required to let her join. She's jealous that she is too young to read, but wants to badly. She flashes up the first book (upside down) and moves her mouth open and shut silently, nods her head, and flips pages sporadically, hmming and hahing to imply she is thoroughly enjoying her books. She manages to "read" 8 books by the time I finish one. It's side-splitting to watch (and my sister thinks so too now of course.)

Last month I was at my parents' house on Christmas eve sorting through a box of old pictures, and I found a photograph that really epitomizes most of my vacation memories as a little girl. The four of us (mom, dad, lauren, me) sitting outside a tent. Dad is playing guitar. Lauren is eating something. Mom is doing my hair, brushing it hard, putting it in a ponytail, and my face is shoved in a book, straining to continue reading despite the whole hair process. This is exactly how I remember family vacations. I would always check out as many books as I could from the library then hole myself up in the house to read them all. My mom would get SO mad because she wanted me to spend time with the family.

I too, like ZuZu, love foreign languages and language in general. In the future I would like to learn Korean and Swedish. Words are beautiful. As it might take weeks to formulate an acceptable and adequate explanation of the beauty of words, I must refrain from attempting to do so tonight.

I continuously consider where this Lit major is taking me. Truthfully, I don't know. After a few years of something, I look forward to grad school somewhere. How vague of me. But I do know that words intrigue me because they are the basis of everything; words enable us to engage one another, communicate, learn, be. Language and meaning are inevitable to a culture, to a group of people.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Dream Epiphanies?

I once had what I believe to have been some sort of an epiphany. It was a dream. I'll briefly recount what led up to the dream.

So my dad has always been a big part of my life. When I was about 8ish he took a trip with all of his dude-friends and dad-friends to Colorado for several weeks. To say the least I was very upset as I had not been away from him for that length of time before. I think it is for this reason that I latched on so tightly to the gift he brought back for me when he returned. It was a necklace strung on black leather with two turquoise beads sandwiching a metal pendant with the infinity symbol. I wore this necklace religiously and never took it off for Anything. One day I woke up and it was gone. I searched high and low for it for literally two weeks. I know it sounds ridiculous but I was absolutely distressed, and I refused to let it go.
One morning as I was eating breakfast I suddenly remembered a dream I had had that night. I dreamed that I had found my necklace. Specifically, I dreamed that I had found it between my mattress and the box spring. I remember sitting at the breakfast table dressed in this huge t-shirt that my dad had also brought back for me, and thinking to myself "what a weird dream." This day was a weekend and therefore I went outside and played with my friends after breakfast. A few hours later I had the odd impulse to just check under my mattress for my necklace just in case. I mean you never know. what if? I honestly expected to be let down, but of course it was there, weirdly enough. I do still have the necklace, but it's so small on me now!